*11/02/2012 | 02:34 uur
Welkom, Gast. Alsjeblieft inloggen of registreren.
De activerings e-mail gemist?
11/02/2012 | 02:34 uur

Login met gebruikersnaam, wachtwoord en sessielengte
*
0 geregistreerde leden en 1 gast bekijken dit topic.
Pagina's: [1] Omlaag Print
Auteur Topic: Features of US Future Army Combat Vehicle Revealed  (gelezen 315 keer)
Leovanw

Activiteit
0%


Berichten: 118
« Gepost op: 12/02/2010 | 01:09 uur »


There has been vigorous discussions on the various merits and shortcomings of the Stryker wheeled vehicle and what might be needed in any future combat vehicles. So, I wanted to provide readers with a bit of information on the new Ground Combat Vehicle (GCV), the replacement program for the cancelled FCS manned ground vehicles (above is an artist's rendering of what the FCS infantry carrier might have looked like).

The Army plans to spend at least $7 billion over the next five years developing the GCV, with $934 million slotted for work in 2011 and nearly $2 billion the next year. The Army wants builders to begin work on the GCV’s subsystems and modular components, such as the engine, drive train, suspension, armor, turret, weapons, active protection system and what it calls a “Mission Module Structure” to carry an infantry squad. Prototypes of the various subsystems are to be ready for testing in early 2012.

To get the process moving, the Army plans to award two competitive contracts in the fourth quarter FY2010. The Army expects builders to use mostly mature technologies in an “evolutionary acquisition approach,” that allows for the “maximum affordable competition” documents say. A subsystem preliminary design review is scheduled for fourth quarter FY2011.

The Army believes a modular assembly approach will facilitate adding technological upgrades, weapons, armor, automotive components and communications networks, over time to the original GCV design. How far along the various modular components are in development, their technological “maturity,” will be key to determining which company gets the GCV contract.
Building a vehicle that can plug into the Army’s existing and future digital communications, surveillance and sensor architecture to provide soldiers “superior” situational awareness is a Key Performance Parameter (KPP), the documents say. The vehicle itself will carry a variety of sensors to provide video feeds to crew and the infantry squad. The Army is also looking for a fuel efficient engine to power the GCV.

The GCV is to be equipped with a suite of non-lethal weapons in addition to a turret mounted cannon (the documents don't specify what size cannon), documents say. Survivability against IEDs and mines will factor huge in the vehicle’s design and the hull must survive “Level 1 underbelly threats” and it must mitigate against “harmful accelerations” to crew and passengers.
Nothing in the budget material about vehicle weight, although there is a reference to “tracks” as a component part, so apparently it will be a tracked infantry fighting vehicle.
Gelogd

http://www.dutchdefencepress.com.  "There is no 'I' in TEAM"
Pagina's: [1] Omhoog Print
Ga naar:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.14 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC