Vervanging huidige F-16's, deel 1

Gestart door civiel, 02/09/2004 | 19:39 uur

Lex


oud_zijde

en als we al die blondjes nu gewoon schilderen?

noem het kunstmatige intelligentie ofzo  8)
It is a corvette when you ask the Treasury for money, a frigate when it is launched, a destroyer when it enters service, a cruiser when it goes to war, but only a corvette if it gets sunk.

Mourning

ZiJN jUlLIe wEL wIJs!!! AAN de EnE KanT GoAn ER 15.000 MenSEn Uut en JUllie WillEN dIE RODe MoPPiES Er biJ HaLEn!! ENig IdEE hOEveEL KamELEn OnS dAH GOaT KoSTEN?!! STelleTjE GekkEN!!! >:( >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(



;)

Regards,

MOuRniNg  :D
"The only thing necessary for Evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing"- Edmund Burke
"War is the continuation of politics by all other means", Carl von Clausewitz, Vom Kriege/On War (1830).

rocco2000

Citaatik hoorde dat roodharigen aan het uitsterven zijn
wtf? ik moet dus duidelijk beter mijn best gaan doen om de roodharigen wat nakomelingen te bezorgen... :angel:
vrijwillig, niet vrijblijvend

oud_zijde

ik hoorde dat roodharigen aan het uitsterven zijn dus dat is misschien wat lastig wbt spare parts enzo
It is a corvette when you ask the Treasury for money, a frigate when it is launched, a destroyer when it enters service, a cruiser when it goes to war, but only a corvette if it gets sunk.

Loup

Citaat van: Offenbach op 18/08/2006 | 11:50 uur
Citaat van: Loup op 18/08/2006 | 11:40 uur
Citaat van: Offenbach op 18/08/2006 | 10:37 uur
Krijgen we die pilote er straks gratis bij  ::)

Misschien had ik erbij moeten zetten: 'cute red-haired pilote sold seperately'  ;)

Die Amerikanen moeten ook overal geld aan verdienen! :( Maar het is wel erg verleidelijk om er één squadron mee uit te rusten..

Is goed voor het moreel zullen we maar zeggen.  ;)

Offenbach

Citaat van: Loup op 18/08/2006 | 11:40 uur
Citaat van: Offenbach op 18/08/2006 | 10:37 uur
Krijgen we die pilote er straks gratis bij  ::)

Misschien had ik erbij moeten zetten: 'cute red-haired pilote sold seperately'  ;)

Die Amerikanen moeten ook overal geld aan verdienen! :( Maar het is wel erg verleidelijk om er één squadron mee uit te rusten..

Loup

Citaat van: Offenbach op 18/08/2006 | 10:37 uur
Krijgen we die pilote er straks gratis bij  ::)

Misschien had ik erbij moeten zetten: 'cute red-haired pilote sold seperately'  ;)

Offenbach

Krijgen we die pilote er straks gratis bij  ::)

Loup

Maar even wat plaatjes?  ;)

F-35 cockpit:






Helmpje:






Mourning

Citaat van: marc66 op 16/08/2006 | 16:19 uur
JSF?, geldverspilling.  :(

Ja, ja, ja, we weten het NU WEL! ALLES naar de Marine, het is duidelijk.
"The only thing necessary for Evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing"- Edmund Burke
"War is the continuation of politics by all other means", Carl von Clausewitz, Vom Kriege/On War (1830).

marc66


Offenbach

Héél goed, dat is voor de sceptici weer een stok minder om mee te slaan.  ;)

Lex

Lockheed Says F-35 Could Fly Pilotless

Pentagon Demand for Drones Grows
By Renae Merle

Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, August 16, 2006; D01

Lockheed Martin Corp. has proposed an unmanned version of its Joint Strike Fighter, the F-35, which would make it the first full-scale fighter to operate without a pilot and signal the Bethesda weapons maker's push into the growing market for drone aircraft.
The idea has been in the works for two years, Lockheed Vice President Frank Mauro said at a briefing yesterday. He provided few details but said the plane could be built as an interchangeable hybrid -- manned by a pilot for some missions and operated remotely for others.
The Joint Strike Fighter, funded with help from several other countries, is meant to replace the F-16 as the workhorse fighter of the United States and its close allies. Less powerful than the F-22 Raptor that Lockheed developed to give the United States an advantage in air combat, the Joint Strike Fighter is still designed to travel at supersonic speed and carry up to 15,000 pounds of bombs and missiles.
Test flights of the F-35 are expected to begin later this year. The idea of a remote-control version of the plane has not been pitched to the Air Force, though it has been through the company's conceptual design phase, Lockheed officials said.
Air Force officials could not be reached for comment yesterday.
Yesterday's briefing marked a strategic turn for Lockheed, which for years has stayed publicly on the sidelines as the Pentagon increased its spending on unmanned systems.
Such competitors as Northrop Grumman Corp. and Boeing Co. are entrenched in the market, with products such as Northrop Grumman's Global Hawk surveillance drone, which is deployed overseas.
Lockheed ceded the market in the late 1990s while it focused on winning the contract to build what many predict will be the Air Force's last manned fighter jet, the F-35. Lockheed then feared that the unmanned market could diminish demand for its more expensive fighter jets, analysts said.
"When you think about unmanned combat systems, I think about Boeing," said John E. Pike, executive director of GlobalSecurity.org.
But in the past three to four years, Lockheed's aeronautics division has spent 30 to 40 percent of its internal research-and-development budget on unmanned systems, company officials said. That includes $21 million the company has spent on the Polecat, a prototype drone that Lockheed plans to test at 60,000 feet or above this year. At a briefing yesterday, the firm trumpeted a stable of unmanned systems that can run on the ground, hauling equipment and supplies for troops, and underwater, searching for submarines and mines. Some of the systems are still being developed and some are deployed in Iraq.
Much of the work is being done at Lockheed's research-and-development lab in California, known as the Skunk Works, where the U-2 spy plane was developed in secret in the 1950s.
Some of the company's investment "is playing catch-up for all those big dollars that the government has invested" in unmanned technology, and some is "leapfrogging" existing systems, Mauro said.
The Pentagon, looking to save money, has accelerated spending on unmanned systems since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. This year, it allocated $2 billion for unmanned aircraft and millions more in the supplemental budget, compared with $363 million in 2001. The figure is projected to reach more than $3 billion by the end of the decade.
What has resulted is a hodgepodge of unmanned vehicles, such as small, bomb-seeking robots that can be carried in a backpack, and airplanes that provide surveillance for days at a time. The systems have become bigger and more expensive in recent years, such as the Predator, built by General Atomics Aeronautical Systems Inc., and the Global Hawk, which has a 134-foot wingspan, comparable to the Boeing 737.
"Lockheed is playing catch-up and acknowledging that unmanned vehicles is a trend that is not going to go away," said Loren B. Thompson Jr., a defense industry analyst and Lockheed consultant. "It's going to be hard to penetrate a market where competitors are already established."
"We're looking at picking it up when we get enough customer interest, and that's the way they want to go," Mauro said. "Right now we're focused on getting the manned version of the F-35 flying."
While some analysts called the idea improbable, it could be an acknowledgment that the Pentagon's initial plan to buy about 2,000 F-35s is now considered likely to change -- in part because of improved drone technology. The decision to propose an unmanned F-35 may anticipate the day when all military aircraft are pilotless, analysts said.
The F-35 program has run into problems, including a rising price that is expected to reach $276 billion, up from the original estimate of $201 billion.
"I think they would be crazy not be looking at this," Pike said. "It's a foregone conclusion that at some point in the F-35 production program that [the Air Force is] going to decide we're going to replace the rest with unmanned systems." It would be smart "if Lockheed can come in and say, 'We have a solution for this.' "

Lex

Voor de liefhebbers die alles mbt de JSF willen volgen.

JSF Program Control Shifts to U.S. Navy
By CHRISTOPHER P. CAVAS
Posted 08/03/06 17:07 Defense News

Responsibility for developing and purchasing the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) shifted to the U.S. Navy on July 31 after two years under the U.S. Air Force.
The Pentagon periodically transfers JSF oversight authority between the two services. Responsibility for the program, established in 1994, was last held by the Navy from 2001 to 2004.
The shift means Delores Etter, assistant secretary of the Navy for research, development and acquisition, is the program's chief acquisition officer.
Uniformed oversight of the JSF program office also shifted, with Air Force Brig. Gen. Charles Davis taking over as program executive officer and program director of the JSF Joint Program Office from Rear Adm. Steven Enewold.
Marine Corps Brig. Gen. Duncan Heinz also assumed the duties as the JSF deputy program executive officer.
The JSF is the Pentagon's largest acquisition program with a 2005 projected cost of $276.5 billion. According to the Congressional Research Service, up to 2,458 aircraft are to be produced in three versions for the U.S. Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps and British Royal Navy. More planes could be purchased by Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Israel, the Netherlands, Norway, Singapore and other countries.
Prime contractor Lockheed Martin is producing the JSF — dubbed the Lightning II — with principal industrial partners Northrop Grumman and BAE Systems.
The inaugural flight of the first F-35, a preproduction conventional-takeoff and -landing variant, is planned for later this year, according to the JSF program office.